Proof of stake energy consumption

Proof of Work (PoW) vs Proof of Stake (PoS) | HashFeed

The big problem with NFTs: Energy Consumption - The NFT

  1. Proof of Stake So, the ETH blockchain currently uses PoW but is in the midst of transitioning into PoS (proof-of-stake), which is expected to cut down the energy consumption by 99% — source . Proof of stake is an alternative mechanism where a random person who has a stake in the network is picked to solve one block, instead of having thousands of nodes compete to solve blocks
  2. If the value of the Bitcoin or Ethereum network rises, the energy consumed must generally also rise, as it is the cost of that energy that protects the value stored in the network. In a Proof of..
  3. According to the Digiconomist, the annual estimated electricity consumption of the Bitcoin network is currently around 49.06 TWh. In addition to high energy consumption, here are some other problems with Proof of Work
  4. Proof of Stake is undeniably better in terms of lower energy consumption (and thus lower environmental impact); however, it is largely untested, at least on the scale of Proof of Work, which has seen over a decade of testing on the popular Bitcoin network
  5. e blockchain ordering. Rather than rely on computers racing to generate the appropriate hash, the idea behind a PoS protocol is that participation is deter

The Environmental Impact of Proof of Stake (PoS) Although PoS blockchains still utilize cryptography, their energy consumption is dramatically lower than PoW-driven alternatives. Because miners do.. More energy efficient algorithms, like proof-of-stake, have been in development over recent years. In proof-of-stake coin owners create blocks rather than miners, thus not requiring power hungry machines that produce as many hashes per second as possible. Because of this, the energy consumption of proof-of-stake is negligible compared to proof-of-work. Bitcoin could potentially switch to such. Ethereum has plans to change its proof-of-work algorithm to an energy efficient proof-of-stake algorithm called Casper. This change would minimize energy consumption and will be implemented gradually according to the latest roadmap. For now, Ethereum is still running on proof-of-work completely


What is Proof of Stake? - Forkas

Proof of Work vs. Proof of Stake in Simple Term

The proof of stake concept seeks to address the underlying issue of energy consumption by attributing mining power to the amount of coins that a miner has in their possession It made mining less energy-consuming, and way easier (especially for coin holders). Advantages of Proof-of-stake. PoS has the following advantages: A significant reduction in energy consumption (relatively to the PoW method); To create a double-spending attack, it is necessary to concentrate more than 50% of the total amount of the entire currency, which will cost a huge fortune. In the event.

Mining Proof of Work cryptocurrencies requires an enormous amount of energy, a very different issue with Proof of stake. If energy consumption of POW coins ever becomes an important issue, then all road leads to proof of stake cryptocurrencies. Scalability and flexibility Proof of work blockchains have a scalability and flexibility issue. The ethereum blockchain processes just 16 transactions. The EOSIO blockchain implements a Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) consensus protocol, thus enhancing the energy efficiency of validating transactions in EOS—the platform's native ERC-20 token. Briefly put, the platform's governance involves 21 block producers who are elected by EOS token holders Proof of Stake is an emerging consensus mechanism that needs to be performed in order to create a new group of trustless transactions (the so-called block) on a distributed ledger called blockchain. In the new age of Digital Currencies, there has to be something to back the creation of the coins, and with that comes Proof of Stake

Ethereum's plan is to replace PoW with proof of stake (PoS)—an alternative mechanism for distributed consensus that was first applied to a cryptocurrency with the launch of Peercoin in 2012. Proof of Stake is a conceptualized alternative to the original Proof of Work consensus mechanism. The idea first arrived in August 2012 when two developers discovered that the notion of coin age could replace PoW and increase energy efficiency

Proof of stake does not use a mathematical puzzle; instead, it relies on a deterministic probability influenced by the number of coins staked at a specific moment. In other words, your chances of creating a valid block will be proportional to the number of coins you lock or put at stake. For example, someone with 30 coins is three times more likely to be the next block validator than. With the rise of energy consumption by Bitcoin's Proof of work and Ethereum's plan of switching to Proof of Stake system, the two have been in discussion a lot in the recent days. While Proof of stake seems a lot better in theory, is it really better? Lets do a quick comparison. Proof Of Work. In a Proof of Work system, a miner is required to perform some work like solving a maths puzzle. Proof of stake is an easier-to-understand system, which allows easier participation through the staking of capital. It is also able to achieve similar security outcomes without the electricity consumption of the proof of work mechanism,.

Because of this, the energy consumption of Proof of Stake is negligible compared to Proof of Work. The first cryptocurrency to adopt the PoS method was Peercoin. Nxt, Blackcoin, and ShadowCoin soon followed suit. The Proof of Stake (PoS) seeks to address this issue by attributing mining power to the proportion of coins held by a miner Proof of stake removes the need to invest energy (or work) and replaces it with a financial investment. In the PoS model, the network is comprised of those who hold the network tokens and are prepared to stake them for the right to validate blocks. How the right is awarded is determined by the network rules Proof of Stake is a conceptualized alternative to the original Proof of Work consensus mechanism. The idea first arrived in August 2012 when two developers discovered that the notion of coin age could replace PoW and increase energy efficiency. Since 2015 Ethereum developers have worked hard on migrating their own network from PoW to PoS. After five years, the team has finally launched the first phase of Ethereum 2.0. We have yet to see whether the new network can support the workload of the.

In proof-of-stake coin owners create blocks rather than miners, thus not requiring power hungry machines that produce as many hashes per second as possible. Because of this, the energy consumption of proof-of-stake is negligible compared to proof-of-work. Bitcoin could potentially switch to such an consensus algorithm, which would significantly improve environmental sustainability. The only downside is that there are many different versions of proof-of-stake, and none of these have fully. and Proof of Stake (PoS) protocol in three dimensions: energy consumption, robustness, and transaction processing speed. To compare the three consensus protocols in terms of trade e ciency, webuiltanagent-basedmodelandfindthatRPoSprotocolhasgreaterorsimilartraderequest-satisfied ratio than PoW and PoS. Hence, we suggest that RPoS is very suitable for building a robust digita Advantages Of Proof Of Stake. Energy Benefits - In a proof of stake, there are no math puzzles to solve so it is a much better and greener alternative to proof of work systems. 51% attacks - In a proof of work system, a miner holding more than 50% of the mining power is able to attack the blockchain for double spending. In a proof of stake system, the attacker will need to buy out more than 50% of the coins in the network to perform a 51% attack which is far more expensive With its multi-lane processing capacity using Delegated Proof of Stake consensus algorithm (DPoS), EOS breathes fire and definitely delivers in all areas where it needs. The EOS network operates with 21 elected Block Producers and 53 stand by Block Producers ready to stand in at any point as voted by token holders. EOS Energy Breakdown. If we add the top 21 and 53 standby candidates, this. of one particular proof-of-stake protocol - Ouroboros [KRDO17]. 2 Proof-of-Stake As mentioned in the previous section, proof-of-stake is one of the main candi-dates to solve the energy demand problem in the current blockchain protocols such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. To best of our knowledge, idea for proof-of-stake originates from the user Quan

In addition to that, proof of stake coins is really eco-friendly, unlike the Proof of Work systems. Since the Proof of Work systems relies heavily on energy consumption and mining equipment, its long term effects on nature and carbon footprint are remained to be seen. Many critics against cryptocurrencies are also using this argument to criticize Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. But wit Proof of stake is a typical computer algorithm through which some cryptocurrencies achieve their distributed consensus. It is also a better alternative to the proof of work algorithm by achieving the same distributed consensus at a lower cost and in a more energy efficient way. (For more details on POS vs POW read here Crypto mining is energy-intensive. Reports indicate that it consumes more energy than around 159 countries. Such high-level consumption is a threat to the world and its sustainability. Here is all you need to know about crypto mining and energy consumption Proof of Stake vs Proof of Work Less Energy-Intensive. Rather than pitting them against each other in a race to solve the computationally intensive hash puzzle, miners in a Proof of Stake dynamic are instead randomly selected to validate blocks of data in exchange for a cut of the transaction fees. To disincentivize attackers, the Proof of Stake protocol requires users to stake a certain. In this article, the energy consumption of an XRP validator is studied. Specifically, both the wall socket energy and the CPU package energy are measured using a software-based energy profiler and external measurement tools across 30 minute intervals. Various parameters in the configuration settings are also modified to study whether there is a significant change in the energy consumed.

Comparing Proof of Work and Proof of Stake Energy Consumption PoW. Bitcoins annual energy consumption peaked this year at about 73/TWh which is enough to power the entire country of Austria and consumed more energy than 80% of countries did in 2014 according to some estimates. Per transaction Bitcoin creates about 0.23 tonnes of C02 emissions, that translates to executing only about 70 transactions and you will have created equivalent annual emissions as an average American. Although in. In a distant future, Ethereum will be updated to ETH2 based on the PoS (Proof-of-stake) consensus. This will reduce drastically the energy consumption of the network, but it has been coming soon for the past 6 years In Proof-of-Stake (PoS), energy consumption is minimal compared to Proof-of-Work (PoW). In PoW, miners have to solve complex mathematical puzzles that are computationally intensive. It means that their hardware uses lots of electrical power to solve these computational problems. On the other hand, PoS depend on little electrical power to run. Considering the bright future of cryptocurrency. Proof-of-stake is the underlying mechanism that activates validators upon receipt of enough stake. For Ethereum, users will need to stake 32 ETH to become a validator. Validators are chosen at random to create blocks and are responsible for checking and confirming blocks they don't create. A user's stake is also used as a way to incentivise good validator behavior. For example, a user can lose a portion of their stake for things like going offline (failing to validate) or their entire stake. A Deep Dive Into Crypto's Energy Consumption Cryptocurrencies are using different types of algorithms to secure their network - the most common ones being Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS). Both systems have a different approach to ensure the security of the network and to validate transactions. The Bitcoin network uses PoW

The proof-of-stake and proof-of-authority methods are significantly less energy-intensive than proof-of-work validation. If those building blockchain applications move toward less energy-intensive methods of verification, there should be a resultant decrease in blockchain energy consumption In the Proof of Stake systems, creators of new blocks are created in a Less energy consumption. The big issue when it comes to mining Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies is the amount of energy used to keep the hardware mining machines operating. When Bitcoin started out the amount of computational power and hardware needed was what many families had at home. Now there are specialised.

Proof of stake removes the need to invest energy (or work) and replaces it with a financial investment. In the Proof of Stake model, the network is comprised of those who hold the network tokens and are prepared to stake them for the right to validate blocks. How the right is awarded is determined by the network rules So, switching to other protocols like Proof-of-Stake or DPos or P roof-of - Authority can hel p in redu cing the energy consumption for validating blocks or transactions Energy Efficiency The main problem with PoW is that the required computing power is very energy intensive and negatively affects the environment. For example, the Bitcoin network's annual energy consumption is 57,6 TWh, which corresponds to all the energy consumed by Colombia. PoS systems are much more energy efficient since they do not. For example, the energy consumption of the Bitcoin network is reportedly comparable to the energy consumption of the entire nation of Switzerland (population of 8.5 million people). These are just some of the reasons why cryptocurrency enthusiasts started to look for alternative ways of achieving consensus in a blockchain network. One of the most popular alternatives to proof-of-work is proof.

Considered Proof-of-Work waste energy to maintain security of a public censorship resistant consensus ledger. Though there is a long standing debate about this point. You can see for yourself that Bitcoin consumes more than $1 mln of value per day. Energy consumption on hash calculations is estimated to be around Iceland's energy consumption Developed as an energy-saving alternative to PoW, Proof of Stake is adopted by many blockchains today. It introduces security deposits called stakes. Miners are replaced by the validators. They are selected based on their stakes to perform mining and add a new block. The blockchains implementing this protocol consumes less energy. These have a. A key advantage of the Proof of Stake system is higher energy efficiency. By cutting out the energy-intensive mining process, Proof of Stake systems may prove to be a much greener option compared to Proof of Work systems. Additionally, the economic incentives provided by Proof of Stake systems may do a better job of promoting network health Proof of Stake takes away the energy and computational power requirement of PoW and replaces it with a stake. A Stake is referred to as an amount of currency that an actor is willing to lock up for a certain amount of time. In return, they get a chance proportional to their stake to be the next leader and select the next block, ultimately gaining the network reward. PoS uses a time-stamping.

Whether Proof of Stake (POS) is a better concept relative to Proof of Work (POW) has been debated in the crypto world for several years. Proof-of-stake is perceived as a method of maintaining the integrity of a cryptocurrency, preventing users from printing extra coins they didn't earn.POS intends to mitigate the regressive distribution of POW mining rewards and move directionally towards. Proof of Stake Idea. The idea behind proof of stake is to solve the problem of proof-of-work associated with high energy consumption. Instead of the computing power of the participants, the amount of cryptocurrency in their account matters. So, instead of using a large amount of electricity to solve the PoW problem, the PoS participant has a. Akten also noted that these costs are entirely reflective of the energy consumption for using a Proof-of-Work (PoW) blockchain, without taking the energy cost of creating any of the original artwork into account. He suggests Proof of Stake (PoS) blockchains like ETH2 and Polkadot as an alternative, which grants and limits mining power based on the proportion of coins held by a miner instead of.

Bitcoin in particular uses as much energy as countries like Austria (the 40th country in the world by energy consumption). Since Proof of Stake doesn't require miners to use lots of energy in order to validate transactions, many think that such a system would be better for the environment, since crypto networks will likely only get bigger and use more and more energy. While Bitcoin does. The Ouroboros Proof of Stake Protocol Ouroboros is a proof of stake protocol that solves one of blockchains' most significant challenges: the need for more computing power to mine blocks and secure a network. Cardano claims that Ouroboros is the first of its kind to be developed based on peer-reviewed research consumption. A concept termed proof-of-stake was discussed among Bitcoin circles as early as 2011. Roughly speaking, proof-of-stake means a form of proof of ownership of the currency. Coin age consumed by a transaction can be considered a form of proof-of-stake. W

Proof of Work vs Proof of Stake Krake

2 Proof-of-Stake Consensus - The Energy Free Consensus Peercoin's approach to consensus was quite pioneering. It abandons the amazingly successful proof-of- work consensus of Bitcoin entirely, in search of an algorithm that has absolutely no dependency on energy consumption at all. It puts a lot of faith into proof-of-stake, believing that the concept could stand alone to form a consensus. Proof of Stake coins Tezos (WTZ) This coin is widely known for having one of the biggest ICOs of all time, with nearly $232 million invested in XTZ tokens. Tezos is a multi-purpose blockchain which uses a Proof-of-Stake protocol to secure its network. Token holders can delegate their accounts to other token holders called validators without. In 2013, Vitalik Buterin published a whitepaper that conceptualized A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform - Ethereum.Initially launched with a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus algorithm in 2015, the vision has always been for Ethereum to become an energy-efficient proof-of-stake (PoS) network. For the first few years, the Ethereum community labored. However, Buterin admits that Ethereum mining now purportedly consumes more electricity than Iceland. Thus, to sustain or enhance its competitive advantage, Ethereum is aiming to reduce energy consumption by scraping its blockchain based on proof-of-work (PoW) and instead building an entirely new blockchain based on the proof-of-stake (PoS) algorithm Proof-of-Stake: Significant Costs: Equipment + Electricity: Crypto Asset: Hardware: ASIC / GPU: General Computers: Rewards: Fixed: Variable: Cooperative Options: Cloud Mining / Mining Pools: Delegating / Staking Services: Disadvantages: High Energy Consumption, High Barriers to Entry: Less Proven and Test: Participants: Miners : Validators: The primary difference between POW and POS is the.

Bitcoin's energy consumption, according to the Energy Consumption Index. Digiconomist Cryptocurrency fans may remember de Vries from a December 2017 analysis that went viral For all the Blockchain enthusiasts, Proof-of-Stake (PoS) is the panacea to the core challenge of astronomical energy consumption of Proof-of-Work (PoW) based blockchain networks i.e. Bitcoin and Ethereum. There have been a lot of research and discussions to argue the technical and philosophical pros and cons of each approach. This article is not meant to highlight thes

Currently, the annual energy consumption for mining is comparable to the annual electricity consumption of some countries, for example Switzerland. Proof-of-Stake. The idea of the Proof-of-Stake system emerged in 2011, as a result of the development of the blockchain industry and the aggravation of the problem of energy intensity. The Prоoof. There are other methods to establish trust in a blockchain network, like Proof of Stake (PoS), which require far less energy. I want to focus on Proof of Work as this is the system which currently secures the most value in the crypto currency space. It's hard to calculate the real power consumption of a blockchain. Estimates are mostly concerned with the current hash rate (how many tries to. 1) Energy consumption. Running the nodes that validate transactions is a massive energy consuming process. In fact, it is estimated that the Bitcoin network uses 0.22% of the global energy consumption and more power than several developing nations It's a staple of any argument over whether Bitcoin has a long-term future: Yeah, super-cool that it eliminates the need for a trusted authority when exchanging value. But do you realize how.

The proof of stake consensus mechanism was put forward by Scott Nadal and Sunny King in 2012 as an alternative to PoW whose downsides (explained in the following section) were starting to bother crypto investors. Let's see how it works. A blockchain that uses proof of stake mechanism is run by validators whose only prerequisite is to hold the blockchain's native currency. To start. PoS Coins Development- How To Create a Proof of Stake Coins? Though it is a relatively new system, Proof of Stake has found plenty of suitors. There are over a hundred different Proof of Stake coins in the cryptocurrency market today. And they all add up to a market cap of over $140 billion. With Ethereum, the second most popular cryptocurrency. Advantages. PoS protocols are much more energy efficient since they eliminate the need for computational-intensive mining.; Proof of Stake incentives security. Since all forgers own an actual stake in the currency, there is a built-in incentive to keep things secure, valid, and above board Cost and Energy. Proof of Stake systems are more cost-efficient and eco-friendly, compared to Proof of Work systems. A PoW system requires more computational power and, as a result, it has a high energy consumption. Due to the fact that Proof of Stake systems have no mining, there is no need for high levels of processing power. A network using.

Understanding Proof-of-Work vs Proof-of-Stake MiningProof of Work vs

Why Is Proof of Stake Better for the Environment? by

High Energy Consumption. Mining cryptocurrency uses a lot a lot of energy. In fact, Bitcoin mining uses more energy per year than the country of Switzerland. Obviously, this isn't really sustainable unless the source of energy is eco-friendly. There have been talks of ' green mining' but another interesting alternative is proof of stake (we'll come onto this later.) 6.2. Increasing. The Proof of Stake was created as an alternative to the Proof of Work (PoW), in order to solve energy cost problems. With Proof of Stake, owners create blocks rather than miners, and not requiring power spending machines that produce as many hashes per second as possible. Because of this, the energy consumption of Proof of Stake is negligible compared to Proof of Work. The first cryptocurrency. Chains with low hashpower would be susceptible to 51% attacks, while Bitcoin's rising energy consumption had already begun to attract the ire of environmentalists. The second consideration that gave rise to Proof of Stake was a desire to increase the security of the chain. Proof of Work is remarkably robust, but it has its drawbacks. that Bitcoin protocol's energy needs are comparable to energy consumption of Ireland [OM14]. Increase in usage will only make the situation worse. This has made blockchain enthusiasts and researchers think of alternatives for PoW. From an abstract view, there are two properties that make a blockchain work: 1 There is a randomized leader election process for issuing each block. In PoW, the. Yes, it consumes lots of electricity. But what are the real energy costs? And what happens if we compare it to our native currencies? A Deep Dive Into Crypto's Energy Consumption. Cryptocurrencies are using different types of algorithms to secure their network - the most common ones being Proof of Work (PoW) and Proof of Stake (PoS). Both.

Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index - Digiconomis

Proof of stake just makes so much more sense to me these days, especially with how energy intensive BTC mining is these days. Anything that can decrease crypto's carbon footprint is a good thing. With so much international focus on the environment, I think new investors in crypto will be looking for something that is more energy efficient and carbon neutral 6 Proof-of-Stake (PoS) A Possibility? 7 A Better Solution Is Making Renewable Energy Ubiquitous; The Digiconomist Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index is a commonly touted resource that many point to as being a key aggregator of stats pertaining to the Bitcoin network's energy use. Let's walk through some of its major implications, at least as the situation stands at press time. BTC's. Gold mining and refining alone takes 2.5x the energy consumption of bitcoin, and the environmental damage (through mining) is much higher too. Your post is excellent, and I agree with all points with the exception of this one. Our banking system isn't even based on gold and has by far the greatest environmental harm on this planet. A debt-based, inflationary economy as designed by the U.S.

Ethereum Energy Consumption Index (beta) - Digiconomis

To get a sense of NFTs' energy consumption, you'll have to understand the process of how they're bought and sold. Here's a simplified version of how it all works. Here's a simplified. Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithms make blockchain networks more efficient by eliminating the energy intensive computational mining process inherent in Proof-of-Work protocols. PoS algorithms incentivize users to confirm network data and ensure security through a process of collateral staking. An iteration of the concept known as delegated PoS works similarly, but features a voting and. Eth2 will reduce energy consumption, allow the network to process more transactions, and increase security. Technically speaking, Ethereum will become a proof-of-stake blockchain and introduce shard chains. This is a huge change to how Ethereum works and it should bring equally huge benefits As more developers and artists seek to escape the rising fees and energy consumption of Ethereum, they will surely be moving across from the Proof-of-Work networks, to the Proof-of-Stake Networks like Tezos to hopefully do their part to counter environmental challenges and to benefit from lower fees too. Image source: Depositphotos.co

Proof of Stake vs

Blockchains and energy consumption Provenance New

Proof-of-stake consensus does not require energy consumption, yet proof-of-stake coins have taken a significant market share. This proves that monetary value does not derive from energy consumption. Monetary value could derive from monetary utility alone. The more people acknowledge and use it as money, the higher monetary base value it achieves. This is an important insight the cryptocurrency. This design attempts to demonstrate the viability of future peer-to-peer crypto-currencies with no dependency on energy consumption. PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-Currency with Proof-of-Stake, 2012 . Proof of Stake is the second most popular consensus mechanism in use today. It has given rise to PoS v2 (Blackcoin), Delegated Proof-of-Stake (Bitshares), Liquid Proof-of-Stake (Tezos) The list is. Proof of Stake has no large scale energy consumption, offers more design flexibility and experimentation, and couples holding with validation. 1) Lower energy consumption. PoS security is highly incentive based, premised on miners or validators putting up collateral that could be taken away if caught acting dishonestly

To mitigate the problem of energy consumption, another consensus protocol called Proof of Stake is considered: in this case, energy consumption is reduced but the privacy and security problems. The proof of stake model, which is used in maintaining the operability of the blockchain is more secure and efficient than using the POW model. Advantages of POS over POW in staking cryptocurrencies. The advantages of POS over POW in staking cryptocurrencies are numerous, and they include the following: Less consumption of energy Hoskinson says the cardano cryptocurrency network consumes only 6 GWh of power, a tiny fraction of bitcoin's energy consumption. Similar proof-of-stake tokens include polkadot and algorand, he added

  • Black Chip Poker Referral code.
  • Raspiblitz x86.
  • Won Yip beleggen.
  • Buy verified PayPal account UK.
  • NIO Aktie 2021.
  • Home ROCKET Ausfall.
  • Bitcoin Wallet Schweiz.
  • Blockfolio vs coin stats.
  • Bitcoinearn.
  • CBOT Börse.
  • Bitcoin multisig script.
  • Skytale.
  • Vegas Rush Casino No Deposit Bonus code 2020.
  • NiceHash GTX 1080 settings.
  • Exodus Wallet download.
  • Kann Bitpanda gehackt werden.
  • Mining Computer bauen.
  • Bitstamp Brexit.
  • Decentraland verwachting 2025.
  • Google Analytics Kosten.
  • Sell MtGox claim.
  • Bitcoin private key to address.
  • CBS full interview.
  • Font Awesome edit.
  • Zcash Prognose 2030.
  • Sunmaker Bonus Code 2021 Bestandskunden.
  • Lieferando Studentenrabatt.
  • MetaTrader 4 installieren.
  • HyperTrader Bitvavo.
  • Crisis movie.
  • Neue Betrugsmasche Autoverkauf.
  • Phoenix miner devfee.
  • Steam Guthaben kostenlos.
  • Ethereum smart contract programming language.
  • Tesla Blase 2021.
  • BitFlyer review trustpilot.
  • Vontobel Zertifikate Schweiz.
  • Hashr8 download.
  • Mooncoin parish mass online.
  • Dogecoin Bewertung.
  • Wo kann ich IOTA kaufen.